| Journal of General Virology |
| SUMMARY | INTRODUCTION | LIFE CYCLE | REVERSE GENETICS SYSTEMS | REPLICATION | VIRUS PROTEINS | GLYCOPROTEINS |
| ACCESSORY PROTEINS | VIRUS VECTORS | LIVE ATTENUATED VIRUS VACCINES | FUTURE PERSPECTIVES | REFS | ||
| First posted online 29 July 2002 | REVIEW ARTICLE |
| DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.18400-0 |
Gabriele Neumann,1 Michael A. Whitt2 and Yoshihiro Kawaoka1,3,4
1 Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of
Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, 2015 Linden Drive
West, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2 Department of Molecular Sciences, University of
Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
3 Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo,
Tokyo, Japan
4 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Japan
Since the first generation of a negative-sense RNA virus entirely from cloned cDNA in 1994, similar reverse genetics systems have been established for members of most genera of the Rhabdo- and Paramyxoviridae families, as well as for Ebola virus (Filoviridae). The generation of segmented negative-sense RNA viruses was technically more challenging and has lagged behind the recovery of nonsegmented viruses, primarily because of the difficulty of providing more than one genomic RNA segment. A member of the Bunyaviridae family (whose genome is composed of three RNA segments) was first generated from cloned cDNA in 1996, followed in 1999 by the production of influenza virus, which contains eight RNA segments. Thus, reverse genetics, or the de novo synthesis of negative-sense RNA viruses from cloned cDNA, has become a reliable laboratory method that can be used to study this large group of medically and economically important viruses. It provides a powerful tool for dissecting the virus life cycle, virus assembly, the role of viral proteins in pathogenicity and the interplay of viral proteins with components of the host cell immune response. Finally, reverse genetics has opened the way to develop live attenuated virus vaccines and vaccine vectors.
Introduction |
Negative-strand RNA viruses are classified into seven families (Rhabdo-, Paramyxo-, Filo-, Borna-, Orthomyxo-, Bunya- and Arenaviridae). The first four families are characterized by nonsegmented genomes, while the latter three have genomes comprising six-to-eight, three or two negative-sense RNA segments, respectively. The large group of negative-sense RNA viruses includes highly prevalent human pathogens, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza viruses and influenza viruses, and two of the most deadly human pathogens (Ebola and Marburg viruses), as well as viruses with a major economic impact on the poultry and cattle industries [e.g. Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and rinderpest virus (RPV)].
Reverse genetics, as the term is used in molecular virology,
describes the generation of viruses possessing a genome derived
from cloned cDNAs. Reverse genetics systems have been established
to artificially produce members of the Rhabdo-, Paramyxo-, Filo-,
Bunya- and Orthomyxoviridae families (Table
1
An overview of the life cycle of negative-sense RNA viruses |
Negative-sense RNA viruses infect their host cells by binding to a
host cell receptor via a viral surface glycoprotein. Subsequent
fusion of the viral membrane with the plasma membrane
(pH-independent pathway) (Fig.
1A) or with endosomal membranes in the acidic
environment of late endosomes (pH-dependent pathway) (Fig. 1B) releases viral ribonucleoprotein
(RNP) complexes into the cytoplasm. RNP complexes are composed of
the viral RNA (vRNA), the nucleoprotein, which encapsidates the
vRNA, and the viral polymerase complex. Individual mRNAs are
synthesized during transcription, while replication leads to the
synthesis of full-length antigenomic RNAs, which, in turn, serve as
templates for genomic vRNA synthesis. Most of the negative-sense
RNA viruses replicate in the cytoplasm of infected cells, in
contrast to the nuclear replication of orthomyxoviruses and
bornaviruses. Thus, for these latter viruses, incoming RNP
complexes and newly synthesized NP and polymerase proteins have to
be imported into the nucleus, whereas newly assembled RNPs are
exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Newly synthesized RNP
complexes are assembled with viral structural proteins at the
plasma membrane or at membranes of the Golgi apparatus, followed by
the release of newly synthesized viruses. For more detailed
information on the life cycles of negative-sense RNA viruses, the
reader is referred to the relevant chapters in Fields, Virology
(Knipe & Howley, 2001
), and to review articles on this topic
(Curran & Kolakofsky, 1999
; Buchmeier et
al., 2001
; de la Torre, 2001
; Lamb &
Kolakofsky, 2001a
; Lamb & Krug, 2001b
; Rose & Whitt,
2001
; Sanchez
et al., 2001
; Schmaljohn & Hooper, 2001
).
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of virus entry. Negative-sense RNA viruses bind
to host cell receptors via viral surface glycoproteins. (A)
pH-independent pathway. Fusion of the viral membrane with the
plasma membrane releases RNP complexes into the cytoplasm. (B)
pH-dependent pathway. Viruses are internalized by receptor-mediated
endocytosis. The low pH in late endosomes triggers conformational
changes in the viral glycoproteins that lead to the fusion of the
viral and endosomal membranes and the subsequent release of RNP
complexes into the cytosol.
Reverse genetics systems |
The first reverse genetics systems were established with
positive-sense RNA viruses (Taniguchi et al., 1978
; Racaniello &
Baltimore, 1981
). Transfection of the full-length RNAs of
positive-sense RNA viruses into eukaryotic cells results in viral
protein expression which leads to virus replication. In contrast,
the genomes of negative-sense RNA viruses alone are noninfectious.
Initiation of virus replication and transcription requires
coexpression of the viral polymerase complex in addition to
vRNA(s); furthermore, the genome has to be complexed with the
nucleocapsid protein.
In 1989, Palese and colleagues established the first system for the
modification of a negative-sense RNA virus, influenza A virus
(Luytjes et al., 1989
; Enami et al., 1990
; reviewed by
Garcia-Sastre & Palese, 1993
; Garcia-Sastre et al., 1994b
; Palese, 1995
; Palese et
al., 1996
; Neumann & Kawaoka, 1999
). A cDNA encoding
the reporter protein chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) was
cloned in negative-sense orientation between the 5´ and
3´ noncoding viral sequences. A T7 RNA polymerase promoter
sequence and a recognition sequence for a restriction enzyme that
allowed the formation of authentic viral 3´ ends flanked this
construct. In vitro transcription yielded virus-like RNA
that was subsequently mixed with purified polymerase and NP
proteins to reconstitute RNP complexes. These artificially
generated RNPs were transfected into eukaryotic cells infected with
helper influenza virus. The viruses that were generated contained
the virus-like RNA encoding CAT in addition to the eight influenza
vRNAs (Luytjes et al., 1989
). This achievement was quickly followed by
the first alteration of a viral gene (Enami et al.,
1990
).
Although allowing site-directed mutagenesis of an influenza viral
gene for the first time, this system relies on helper-virus
infection and strong selection systems are necessary to distinguish
the modified virus from the (wild-type) helper virus.
For most negative-sense RNA viruses, the ability to generate
infectious negative-sense RNA virus entirely from cloned cDNA was
preceded by the establishment of minireplicon systems. In these
systems, T7 RNA polymerase was used to synthesize negative-sense
vRNA derived from cDNA clones of internally deleted viral genomes.
Upon transfection of the vRNA into eukaryotic cells that had been
infected with helper virus, the artificially generated vRNAs were
rescued into viruses (Collins et al., 1991
; Park et
al., 1991
). Pattnaik & Wertz (1991
) first established
a plasmid-based minireplicon system by providing all five vesicular
stomatitis virus (VSV) viral proteins from protein expression
plasmids. Experience with these different approaches demonstrated
that the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase L, the nucleoprotein N and
the phosphoprotein P are essential for the amplification of rhabdo-
and paramyxovirus genomes (Pattnaik & Wertz, 1990
, 1991
; Collins et
al., 1991
; Conzelmann et al., 1991
; Park et
al., 1991
; Calain et al., 1992
; Dimock &
Collins, 1993
; Sidhu et al., 1995
). For Marburg virus
(family Filoviridae), L, NP and VP35 (which is believed to
be the equivalent of the phosphoprotein) constitute the minimal
replication unit (Muhlberger et al., 1998
), while the VP30
protein is additionally required for replication of the closely
related Ebola virus (Muhlberger et al., 1999
). In contrast, two
proteins, L and NP, are sufficient for the transcription and
replication of bunyavirus (Dunn et al., 1995
; Lopez et
al., 1995
; Flick & Pettersson, 2001
) or arenavirus (Lee
et al., 2000
) minigenomes. For influenza viruses, the
nucleoprotein and the three polymerase subunits PB2, PB1 and PA are
necessary and sufficient for the amplification of vRNAs (Honda
et al., 1987
, 1988
, 1990
; Szewczyk et al., 1988
; Parvin et
al., 1989
).
In 1994, Conzelmann and colleagues (Schnell et al.,
1994
)
generated recombinant rabies virus (RV), demonstrating for the
first time the feasibility of producing a negative-sense RNA virus
entirely from cloned cDNA (Fig.
2A). Cells were cotransfected with protein
expression constructs for the L, P and N proteins and with a cDNA
construct encoding the full-length RV antigenome, all under control
of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter. Infection with recombinant
vaccinia virus (VV), which provided T7 RNA polymerase, was the
final step needed to produce infectious RV. The key element to this
success was the synthesis of a positive-sense antigenomic RNA from
cloned DNA. Positive-sense antigenomic RNA, in contrast to
negative-sense genomic RNA, cannot hybridize to positive-sense
mRNAs encoding the L, P and nucleoproteins and thus does not interfere
with virus generation. Moreover, the genomic RNAs of some
negative-sense RNA viruses contain stretches of uridine residues
followed by hairpin structures that resemble T7 RNA terminator
elements, which may cause premature abortion of T7 RNA polymerase
transcription (Whelan et al., 1995
). Since the initial
report by Schnell et al. (1994
), we have witnessed
the generation of an ever-growing number of rhabdo- and
paramyxoviruses by reverse genetics (Table
1) (reviewed by Conzelmann, 1996
, 1998
; Conzelmann &
Meyers, 1996
; Rose, 1996
; Roberts & Rose, 1998
, 1999
; Marriott &
Easton, 1999
; Nagai, 1999
; Nagai & Kato,
1999
; Munoz et
al., 2000
). Refinements of the original rescue
procedure included the expression of T7 RNA polymerase from stably
transfected cell lines (Radecke et al., 1995
), protein
expression plasmids (Lawson et al., 1995
) or heat shock
procedures to increase rescue efficiencies (Parks et al.,
1999
).
Recently, Ebola virus, a member of the family Filoviridae,
was also generated from cDNA (Volchkov et al., 2001
; Neumann et
al., 2002
). In contrast to these efforts with
positive-sense antigenomic RNA, a number of investigators have also
relied on negative-sense genomic RNA to produce Sendai virus (SeV)
(Kato et al., 1996
), human parainfluenza virus type 3 (hPIV3)
(Durbin et al., 1997a
) and Ebola virus (Neumann et al.,
2002
),
although with lower efficiencies.
Fig. 2. Systems
for the generation of negative-sense RNA viruses from cloned cDNA.
(A) Schematic diagram for the generation of nonsegmented
negative-sense RNA viruses. Cells are cotransfected with protein
expression plasmids for the N, P and L proteins and with a plasmid
containing a full-length viral cDNA, all under the control of the
T7 RNA polymerase promoter. Following infection with recombinant VV
encoding T7 RNA polymerase, vRNA is synthesized and the virus
replication cycle is initiated. (B) Schematic diagram for the
generation of influenza A virus. Cells are cotransfected with
plasmids that encode all eight vRNAs under the control of the RNA
polymerase I promoter. Cellular RNA polymerase I synthesizes vRNAs
that are replicated and transcribed by the viral polymerase and NP
proteins, all provided by protein expression plasmids.
Another breakthrough occurred in 1996 with the first generation of
a segmented negative-sense RNA virus from cloned cDNAs (Bridgen
& Elliott, 1996
). Following the approach outlined by
Schnell et al. (1994
), Bridgen & Elliott (1996
) created Bunyamwera
virus (family Bunyaviridae), thus demonstrating the
feasibility of artificially producing more than one vRNA.
The generation of influenza virus is far more complex than that of
nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses, as it requires eight vRNAs
as well as four proteins encoding the three polymerase
subunits and NP. Secondly, influenza virus replicates in the
nucleus of infected cells, so that the vRNAs and proteins have to
be delivered to this cellular compartment. A solution was provided
by Hobom and colleagues (Zobel et al., 1993
; Neumann et
al., 1994
), who established the RNA polymerase I
system for the intracellular synthesis of influenza vRNAs. RNA
polymerase I, a nucleolar enzyme, synthesizes ribosomal RNA, which,
like influenza virus RNA, does not contain 5´ cap or 3´
poly(A) structures. Hence, RNA polymerase I transcription of a cDNA
construct containing an influenza viral cDNA, flanked by RNA
polymerase I promoter and terminator sequences, results in
influenza vRNA synthesis. This system enabled the generation of
influenza virus from plasmids in 1999 (Neumann et al.,
1999
; Fodor
et al., 1999
; reviewed by Pekosz et al.,
1999
; Neumann
& Kawaoka, 2001
) (Fig.
2B). By transfecting eukaryotic cells with eight RNA
polymerase I plasmids encoding all vRNAs, together with protein
expression constructs for the polymerase and NP proteins (yielding
a total of 12 plasmids), one can now produce more than
108 infectious viruses per ml of supernatant derived 2
days after transfection. In a modified RNA polymerase I system,
both negative-sense vRNA and positive-sense mRNA can be synthesized
from the same template, thus reducing the number of plasmids
required (i.e. 8 instead of 12) (Hoffmann et al., 2000a
, b
; Hoffmann &
Webster, 2000
).
Thogoto virus, a second member of the family
Orthomyxoviridae, was recently generated from plasmids
(Wagner et al., 2001
). The genome of this tick-transmitted
orthomyxovirus consists of six segments of negative-sense RNA. The
RNA polymerase I system allowed the synthesis of all six vRNAs,
while the proteins required for transcription and replication were
expressed with the VV T7 RNA polymerase system.
Replication and transcription of nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses |
The genes of nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses are separated
by regulatory regions comprising a gene end signal (i.e.
transcription stop and polyadenylation), an intergenic region and a
gene start signal (i.e. transcription start signal) (Fig. 3). These signals are
both sufficient and necessary for gene transcription (Kuo et
al., 1996b
; Schnell et al., 1996b
). The gene
transcription units are flanked by so-called leader and trailer
regions, which contain the viral promoters for replication and
transcription.
Fig. 3. Genome
organization of nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses, as
exemplified by VSV. The coding regions for the nucleoprotein (N),
phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), glycoprotein (G) and
polymerase protein (L) are separated by regulatory sequences that
contain a transcription stop (gene end) signal, a polyadenylation
signal, a nontranscribed intergenic region and a transcription
start (gene start) signal. Transcription units are flanked by a
leader (Le) and trailer (Tr) region that contain the genomic and
antigenomic viral promoters, respectively.
Gene end signals
In VSV, the gene end signal is highly conserved among all genes.
Alteration of the conserved tetranucleotide transcription stop
signal reduced the ability to terminate RNA transcription (Barr
et al., 1997a
; Hwang et al., 1998
) and affected
polyadenylation (Barr & Wertz, 2001
). Furthermore, the
tetranucleotide is functional only when juxtaposed to the uridine
stretch that functions as a polyadenylation signal (Barr et
al., 1997a
) and when positioned at a minimal distance
from the gene start sequence (Whelan et al., 2000
). In addition to
the tetranucleotide, the uridine stretch constituting the
polyadenylation signal is critical for termination, since its
deletion, shortening or interruption resulted in read-through
transcripts (Barr et al., 1997a
; Hwang et
al., 1998
). In contrast to VSV, the polyuridine
tracts of simian virus type 5 (SV5) are of variable lengths and
nucleotide insertions or deletions did not affect termination but
did affect reinitiation at the downstream gene (Rassa et
al., 2000
).
Intergenic region
The intergenic regions of nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses
are highly variable, consisting of a conserved dinucleotide (VSV),
trinucleotide (morbilli- and respiroviruses) or regions of up to
143 nt (filoviruses). For VSV, alterations of the conserved
dinucleotide affected the efficiency of termination of the upstream
mRNA as well as the mRNA levels of the downstream gene (Barr et
al., 1997b
; Stillman & Whitt, 1997
, 1998
). The various
lengths of the intergenic regions of RV correlate with
transcriptional attenuation (Finke et al., 2000
), whereas the
diverse intergenic regions of RSV do not modulate gene expression
(Kuo et al., 1996a
; Bukreyev et al., 2000a
). Similarly,
nucleotide insertions into the middle of the SV5 MF
intergenic region did not affect transcription termination and/or
initiation; however, replacement of the entire MF
intergenic region with nonviral sequences abolished termination of
M gene transcription (Rassa & Parks, 1999
).
Gene start signals
The transcription start signals are identical for all VSV genes.
Mutational analyses revealed that the first three nucleotides of
the 5´ start sequence are critical for gene expression
(Stillman & Whitt, 1997
). Interestingly, mutations in this
sequence did not abolish the initiation of transcription per se but
affected polymerase processivity as well as capping and/or
methylation of mRNA transcripts (Stillman & Whitt, 1999
). Further insights
into transcription initiation came from RSV minigenomes containing
a nucleotide replacement at position 1 of the gene start signal.
mRNAs were synthesized with the predicted nucleotide at the 5´
end; however, a subpopulation of mRNAs contained the (nontemplated)
parental wild-type nucleotide at the 5´ end (Kuo et
al., 1997
). Thus, the polymerase complex may have a
preference for the wild-type nucleotide at the start position. For
SeV, the start sequence of the F gene was significantly weaker than
the P, M and HN start signals (Kato et al., 1999
). A recombinant
SeV, whose F gene start signal was replaced with the strong P, M or
HN gene start signal replicated faster and was more virulent than
wild-type virus in mice (Kato et al., 1999
).
Replication
The switch from transcription to replication was once thought to be
triggered by increasing amounts of soluble N protein, which is
required to encapsidate replicating RNA. However, increasing levels
of RSV N did not alter the ratio between transcription and
replication (Fearns et al., 1997
). Mutational
analysis of the genomic and antigenomic promoter elements has
resulted in the generation of minireplicons that are replicated
poorly but are transcribed well, and vice versa. Rather than
switching between transcription and replication, a balance between
these two processes may be controlled by the different activities
of the genomic and antigenomic promoters (Li & Pattnaik,
1999
; Whelan
& Wertz, 1999
; Hoffman & Banerjee, 2000b
). This idea is
supported by experiments analysing a copy-back ambisense RV
minigenome (Finke & Conzelmann, 1999
).
For rhabdo- and paramyxoviruses, the minimal promoter sequences
have been mapped to the 1244 3´-terminal nucleotides
of VSV (Li & Pattnaik, 1997
, 1999
; Whelan & Wertz, 1999
), SeV (Tapparel
& Roux, 1996
), hPIV3 (Hoffman & Banerjee,
2000b
) or RSV
(Kuo et al., 1996b
; Fearns et al., 2000
) genomes or
antigenomes. For VSV, the extent of complementarity between the
3´ and 5´ ends can affect the level of replication (Wertz
et al., 1994
; Whelan & Wertz, 1999
). However, other
reports indicate that the base pairing potential between the
3´ and 5´ ends of the vRNAs does not affect replication
efficiency; rather, the primary sequence of the promoter elements
determines their strength (Tapparel & Roux, 1996
; Hoffman &
Banerjee, 2000a
). In contrast to rhabdoviruses, the
genomic and antigenomic promoters of paramyxoviruses (with the
possible exception of RSV) contain second promoter elements (Pelet
et al., 1996
; Murphy et al., 1998
; Tapparel et
al., 1998
; Murphy & Parks, 1999
; Hoffman &
Banerjee, 2000b
). These elements are composed of three
hexamers that contain a repeated motif (Tapparel et al.,
1998
; Murphy
& Parks, 1999
; Hoffman & Banerjee, 2000b
). Nucleotide
deletions or insertions between the two promoter elements were
detrimental for their activity, indicating that their relative
spacing is critical (Murphy et al., 1998
; Tapparel et
al., 1998
). In structural models, the two elements
are positioned on the same face of the RNP helix (Murphy et
al., 1998
; Tapparel et al., 1998
). Thus, upon
alteration of their spacing, the interaction of the polymerase
complex with the two promoter elements may be abrogated. Recent
studies also identified a third promoter element for SV5 (located
between the first and the second element) that is required for
optimal replication (Keller et al., 2001
).
The genomic promoter localizes to the 3´ end of the
negative-sense vRNA and hence serves as a promoter for both
replication and transcription. Distinct elements have been
identified in the genomic promoter that are required for
transcription but not for replication, or vice versa (Li &
Pattnaik, 1999
; Whelan & Wertz, 1999
; Peeples &
Collins, 2000
). In contrast, the antigenomic promoter
that localizes to the 3´ end of the positive-sense antigenome
functions in replication only.
'Rule of six'
Efficient replication for most paramyxoviruses was observed only
when the total number of nucleotides was divisible by six (dubbed
the 'rule of six') (reviewed by Kolakofsky et
al., 1998
). The nucleoprotein interacts with exactly
6 nt, and the rule of six seems to depend on the recognition of
nucleotides positioned in the proper N-phase context
(Vulliemoz & Roux, 2001
). Extensive mutagenesis revealed that the
rule of six seems to follow taxonomic grouping, being apparently
specific to the rubula- (Murphy & Parks, 1997
; He & Lamb,
1999
; Peeters
et al., 2000
; Kawano et al., 2001
), respiro- (Calain
& Roux, 1993
, 1995
; Harty & Palese, 1995
; Hausmann et
al., 1996
; Durbin et al., 1997b
) and morbillivirus
(Radecke et al., 1995
; Sidhu et al., 1995
) genera of the
family Paramyxoviridae, although with different stringency.
The rule of six is not followed by RSV (Samal & Collins,
1996
) nor
does it apply to VSV (Pattnaik et al., 1995
).
Replication and transcription of influenza viruses |
Each RNA segment of the segmented negative-sense RNA viruses
constitutes a separate transcription unit. The 5´ 13-terminal
and the 3´ 12-terminal nucleotides are highly conserved among
the eight viral segments of influenza A viruses and form the basic
promoter for transcription and replication (Parvin et al.,
1989
;
Yamanaka et al., 1991
; Li & Palese, 1992
; Seong &
Brownlee, 1992a
, b
; Piccone et al., 1993
). Extensive
mutational analyses revealed the contributions of individual
nucleotides to in vitro and in vivo promoter activity
(Li & Palese, 1992
; Piccone et al., 1993
; Fodor et
al., 1994
, 1995
; Neumann et al., 1994
; Neumann &
Hobom, 1995
; Pritlove et al., 1995
; Flick et
al., 1996
; Kim et al., 1997
). In contrast to
the promoter elements of nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses,
which consist of specific sequence elements at the 3´ ends of
the vRNA or cRNA, the genomic and antigenomic promoters of
influenza viruses are composed of both the 5´ and the 3´
ends of the vRNA or complementary RNA (cRNA), respectively (Fodor
et al., 1993
, 1994
; Tiley et al., 1994
; Neumann &
Hobom, 1995
; Pritlove et al., 1995
). The influenza
viral promoters can be divided into two elements: a terminal
element (nt 19 at the 3´ and 5´ ends of the
vRNA or cRNA) and a distal element (nt 1015 and
1116 at the 3´ and 5´ ends of the vRNA), which
are connected by a flexible joint formed by an unpaired nucleotide
(Fodor et al., 1995
; Neumann & Hobom, 1995
; Flick et
al., 1996
). Within the terminal element, the nature
of the nucleotide sequence is critical, whereas in the distal
element, base-pairing between the 3´ and 5´ ends of the
vRNA or cRNA is crucial (Fodor et al., 1994
, 1995
; Neumann &
Hobom, 1995
; Flick et al., 1996
; Kim et al.,
1997
). Three
promoter models, the 'panhandle' model (Hsu et
al., 1987
), the 'fork' model (Fodor
et al., 1994
, 1995
; Kim et al., 1997
) and the
'corkscrew' model (Flick et al., 1996
; Flick & Hobom,
1999
), have
been proposed. The panhandle model suggests formation of a
partially double-stranded structure in the entire promoter region,
while the fork model proposes double-strand formation for the
distal promoter element only. Recent data favour the corkscrew
model, which predicts base-pairing between nucleotides at the
5´ or 3´ end rather than base-pairing between the 5´
and 3´ end (Flick & Hobom, 1999
; Pritlove et
al., 1999
; Leahy et al., 2001a
, b
). The influenza B
virus promoter has structural features similar to its influenza A
virus counterpart (Lee & Seong, 1996
).
During transcription, the polymerase complex proceeds until it
encounters the polyadenylation signal, which is formed by a uridine
stretch located adjacent to the promoter element. At the uridine
stretch, the polymerase complex 'stutters', resulting
in polyadenylation (Zheng et al., 1999
; Poon et
al., 2000
). Efficient polyadenylation requires that
an uninterrupted uridine stretch be located 1522 nt from
the 5´ end of the vRNA (Luo et al., 1991
; Li & Palese,
1994
).
The terminal promoter elements contain the information sufficient
for replication and transcription; however, signals that modulate
these processes seem to be located in the noncoding regions that
lie between the promoter and the start or stop codon, respectively.
Recombinant viruses with deletions, insertions or mutations in
these regions have been generated (Garcia-Sastre et al.,
1994b
; Barclay
& Palese, 1995
; Bergmann & Muster, 1996
; Zheng et
al., 1996
). Although these viruses were viable, some
had altered amounts of vRNA (Bergmann & Muster, 1996
; Zheng et
al., 1996
).
Phosphoprotein |
Although the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase L is believed to contain
all catalytic activities, phosphoprotein P is essential for vRNA
synthesis. Its interaction with the N protein keeps the latter in a
soluble form and imparts specificity to the N protein to
encapsidate viral, but not cellular, RNAs. Moreover, binding of P
to L allows efficient interaction of L with the NRNA template
(Horikami et al., 1992
). Both the amino- and the carboxy-terminal
domains of P are critical to execute these functions (De et
al., 2000
). For VSV P, replacement of single amino
acids in the carboxy-terminal region resulted in P mutants that
were defective in transcription but supported replication,
suggesting that the transcriptase and replicase complexes may not
be identical (Das et al., 1997
, 1999
).
Reverse genetics has also allowed researchers to address the
biological significance of P protein phosphorylation in the virus
life cycle. The hPIV3 P protein is phosphorylated by the cellular
protein kinase C isoform
(PKC-
) and growth of hPIV3 was
abrogated in the presence of a PKC-
inhibitor (De et al.,
1995
). The
VSV P protein is phosphorylated at several sites in both the amino-
and the carboxy-terminal domains. Replacement of the amino-terminal
phosphorylation sites affected transcription (Spadafora et
al., 1996
; Pattnaik et al., 1997
), while the
carboxy-terminal phosphorylation sites are necessary for optimal
replication (Hwang et al., 1999
). In contrast,
replacement of the SeV P phosphorylation site did not affect virus
replication in cell culture nor did it affect virus pathogenicity
in mice (Hu et al., 1999
).
Matrix proteins |
Matrix proteins constitute the major structural component of the
virion shell. Both the VSV and influenza A virus matrix proteins
are essential for virion formation and have the ability to induce
particle formation (Sakaguchi et al., 1999
; Gomez-Puertas
et al., 2000
; Jayakar et al., 2000
; Latham &
Galarza, 2001
). In contrast, recombinant MV and RV
lacking the M gene (
M) have been generated (Cathomen et
al., 1998a
; Spielhofer et al., 1998
; Mebatsion et
al., 1999
). MV
M was more efficient in inducing cell
fusion than its wild-type counterpart (Cathomen et al.,
1998a
).
Interestingly, MVs isolated from patients with subacute sclerosing
panencephalitis are often defective in M gene expression (Baczko
et al., 1984
).
The SeV M protein is phosphorylated in infected cells but not in
mature virions; therefore, M phosphorylation was thought to
regulate processes such as virion assembly or budding. However, a
recombinant SeV containing a mutation in M that abrogated
phosphorylation was indistinguishable from wild-type virus both
in vitro and in vivo (Sakaguchi et al.,
1997
).
Influenza A virus M2 protein |
The influenza virus M2 protein is expressed from a spliced mRNA
encoded by segment 7. It is an integral membrane protein that
executes functions early and late in the virus replication cycle.
In late endosomes, the M2 ion channel activity allows proton influx
into the virions, thus causing a pH shift that leads to the
dissociation of the M1 protein from RNP complexes. Late in
infection, proton influx through the M2 ion channel raises the pH
in the trans-Golgi network, thereby preventing acid-induced
conformational changes in intracellularly cleaved haemagglutinin
(HA). Reverse genetics experiments indicated that the M2
cytoplasmic tail is critical for virus replication, most likely
through its interaction with other viral proteins (Castrucci &
Kawaoka, 1995
); in contrast, replacement of either the
serine residue at position 64 (the primary M2 phosphorylation site)
or the conserved cysteine residues did not compromise the
recombinant viruses in vitro or in vivo (Castrucci
et al., 1997
; Thomas et al., 1998
).
M2 ion channel activity was long considered essential for virus
replication. However, an influenza virus with a deletion in the M2
transmembrane domain was growth-impaired but still replicated in
cell culture (Takeda et al., 2002
). Another
recombinant virus whose M2 transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains
were deleted grew in cell culture but not in mice (Watanabe et
al., 2001
). Thus, M2 ion channel activity is not
essential for virus replication in vitro but it is required
for in vivo virus replication.
Influenza A virus NS2 protein |
The influenza A virus NS2 protein is translated from a spliced mRNA
encoded by segment 8. It contains a classical nuclear export signal
(NES) in its amino-terminal region and mediates nuclear export when
fused to a reporter construct (O'Neill et al.,
1998
).
Moreover, NS2 interacted with the cellular nuclear export factor
CRM1, which mediates export of proteins with classical NESs
(Neumann et al., 2000a
). In cells infected with virus-like
particles (VLPs) that lacked NS2 or encoded an NS2 protein with an
altered NES, viral RNP complexes were retained in the nucleus, thus
supporting the role of NS2 as the virus nuclear export factor of
viral RNP complexes (Neumann et al., 2000a
).
Viral glycoproteins |
Rhabdoviruses possess a single glycoprotein (G), which is involved in cell attachment and pH-dependent fusion of the viral and cellular membranes. For orthomyxoviruses, the HA protein binds to cellular receptors and mediates the pH-dependent fusion event, while the sialidase activity of the neuraminidase (NA) protein is required to prevent self-aggregation and to prevent viruses from rebinding to cells from which they were released. In contrast to orthomyxoviruses, different proteins encode the attachment and fusion activities for paramyxoviruses. The G (rhabdo- and pneumoviruses), H (morbilliviruses) or HN (respiro- and rubulaviruses) glycoprotein brings about binding to cellular receptors. The fusion (F) protein is involved in the fusion of the viral membrane with the endosomal or plasma membrane, resulting in the release of RNP complexes into the cytoplasm of infected cells. However, for most paramyxoviruses, coexpression of both F and HN is required for fusion activity, indicating a fusion-promoting activity of the HN protein.
Deletion of glycoproteins
A human RSV (hRSV) strain passaged at progressively lower
temperatures contains a deletion of the G gene (as well as of the
SH gene), demonstrating that these proteins are not essential for
virus replication (Karron et al., 1997a
); however, a
recombinant hRSV lacking G was attenuated in its replication
(Techaarpornkul et al., 2001
). Similarly, reverse genetics allowed the
generation of bovine RSV (bRSV) that lacked the G and/or SH genes
(Karger et al., 2001
). The artificially generated viruses did
not display an altered morphology and grew to titres similar to
wild-type virus in cell culture (Karger et al., 2001
). Thus, for hRSV
and bRSV, the F protein seems to be able to function as an
attachment protein, in addition to its critical role in cell fusion
(Kahn et al., 1999
); however, the G protein is needed for
efficient growth of hRSV in mice (Teng et al., 2001
).
Proteolytic cleavage of viral glycoproteins determines pathogenicity
Proteolytic cleavage of the viral fusion protein is one of the key
factors determining virus pathogenicity. Many of the fusion
proteins are synthesized as inactive precursor proteins that are
cleaved by host cell proteases to generate two disulfide-linked
subunits. It is this activated form that initiates the fusion of
the viral and cellular membranes. In avian influenza virus and NDV,
fusion proteins (HA for the former virus) possess multiple basic
amino acids at their cleavage site that are recognized by
ubiquitous cellular proteases, such as furin (Stieneke-Grober et
al., 1992
). In contrast, the fusion proteins of
avirulent viruses contain single basic residues at this site that
are not recognized by the ubiquitous proteases, resulting in local
infections. For avian influenza A viruses, researchers established
a direct link between HA cleavability and virus pathogenicity and
demonstrated that two features were critical for HA cleavage: the
length and composition of the basic amino acid stretch as well as
the presence or absence of a nearby carbohydrate side chain
(Kawaoka & Webster, 1988
, 1989
; Horimoto & Kawaoka, 1994
; Klenk &
Garten, 1994
). The importance of multiple basic amino
acids at the F cleavage site has also been demonstrated for NDV
(Peeters et al., 1999
). For MV, alteration of the multibasic
furin cleavage site of the F protein resulted in recombinant virus
that did not induce neural disease, in contrast to wild-type virus
(Maisner et al., 2000
). Reverse genetics also allowed
researchers to replace the multibasic furin-recognition motif of
the Ebola virus GP protein with nonbasic amino acids.
Interestingly, the recovered virus grew to titres similar to
wild-type virus in cell culture (Neumann et al., 2002
). Hence,
furin-mediated cleavage of the Ebola virus GP protein is not
critical for virus replication in cell culture; however, it may be
required for virus propagation in animals.
Cross et al. (2001
) determined the significance of the large
hydrophobic amino acids of the influenza A virus fusion peptide,
which become exposed after HA cleavage by host cell proteases.
Replacement of hydrophobic amino acids with alanine but not with
glycine yielded viruses capable of replication. Moreover, cell
culture propagation of viruses containing alanine substitutions in
the fusion peptide resulted in pseudoreversion to valine,
indicating a preference for hydrophobic amino acids with a large
side chain in this region (Cross et al., 2001
).
Viral glycoproteins determine host cell tropism
Viral glycoproteins are a major factor in determining host cell
tropism. To study MV cell tropism, two groups of investigators
generated recombinant viruses that contained the H and/or F
proteins derived from a lymphotropic wild-type strain (WTF) of MV
in the background of the tissue culture-adapted Edmonston vaccine
strain (Johnston et al., 1999
; Ohgimoto et al., 2001
). These studies
demonstrated that the WTF H protein can confer the ability to
viruses to replicate in secondary lymphoid tissues in cotton rats
(Ohgimoto et al., 2001
). Furthermore, replacement of the
Edmonston strain H gene with that of the wild-type IC-B strain, or
vice versa, altered the host cell specificity of the resulting
recombinant viruses (Takeuchi et al., 2002
).
MV has the potential to cause neurological complications.
Substitution of the H gene of the Edmonston B vaccine strain with
its counterpart derived from a rodent brain-adapted strain resulted
in a neurovirulent, recombinant virus (Duprex et al.,
1999
).
However, infection progressed more slowly in mice infected with
recombinant virus compared to the rodent brain-adapted parental
strain. Thus, the H protein is an important (although not the only)
factor required for neurovirulence.
Two studies addressed the significance of the RV G protein for
neurovirulence by introducing G protein derived from neurovirulent
strains into the genetic background of less neurotropic strains.
While G is the major determinant of neurotropism, other factors
seem to contribute to pathogenicity (Morimoto et al.,
2000
; Ito
et al., 2001
). Similarly, reciprocal exchange of the
canine distemper virus and MV H proteins demonstrated that they are
important determinants of the growth characteristics and the cell
tropism of the recombinant viruses (von Messling et al.,
2001
).
Cytoplasmic tails of glycoproteins
The cytoplasmic tails of the attachment and fusion proteins are
thought to be critical for virus assembly, most likely through
their interaction(s) with internal viral proteins. The influenza A
virus HA protein contains conserved, palmytilated cysteine residues
in both its cytoplasmic tail and its transmembrane domain.
Replacements of these amino acids yielded conflicting results.
While two groups reported the generation of influenza viruses
lacking the conserved cysteine residues (Jin et al.,
1996
; Lin
et al., 1997
), another group failed to generate such
mutants (Zurcher et al., 1994
). However, these findings may simply
reflect the fact that the different HA subtypes used for these
studies differ in their abilities to tolerate amino acid
replacements. Analysis of recombinant influenza A viruses whose NA
tail was replaced with that of influenza B virus, or whose NA
and/or HA cytoplasmic tails were deleted, demonstrated that the HA
and NA cytoplasmic tails are not absolutely required for virus
propagation (Bilsel et al., 1993
; Jin et al.,
1994
,
1997
;
Garcia-Sastre & Palese, 1995
; Mitnaul et al., 1996
). However, deletion
of the cytoplasmic tails affected the particle shape, reduced the
vRNA:protein ratio and attenuated the recombinant viruses in mice,
suggesting that the HA and NA cytoplasmic tails affect virion
formation and confer a growth advantage to influenza virus
(Garcia-Sastre & Palese, 1995
; Mitnaul et al., 1996
; Jin et al.,
1997
; Zhang
et al., 2000
). Similarly, truncation of the cytoplasmic
tails of the SV5 HN (Schmitt et al., 1999
) or the SeV HN or F
proteins (Fouillot-Coriou & Roux, 2000
) resulted in
recombinant viruses that were impaired in their growth. Recombinant
SV5 or MV with alterations in their HN, F and/or H cytoplasmic
tails displayed enhanced cell-to-cell fusion (Cathomen et
al., 1998b
; Schmitt et al., 1999
). In addition,
basolateral targeting signals have been identified in the
cytoplasmic tails of the MV H and F proteins (Moll et al.,
2001
). For
VSV, replacement of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of G
with those of human CD4 protein did not affect virion budding
(Schnell et al., 1998
). Further analysis demonstrated that a
short cytoplasmic tail without specific sequence requirements is
sufficient to promote efficient budding (Schnell et al.,
1998
). In
addition, a short region in the extracellular stem of G was
identified that confers efficient virus assembly (Robison &
Whitt, 2000
).
Influenza A virus NA protein
The influenza A virus NA protein is composed of a stalk of variable
length and amino acid composition that connects the transmembrane
domain with the globular head, which contains the enzymatic centre.
Recombinant viruses with altered stalks demonstrated that viruses
with longer stalks replicated to higher titres in eggs (Castrucci
et al., 1992
, 1994
; Castrucci & Kawaoka, 1993
; Luo et al.,
1993
).
Stalk-less viruses were not restricted in their growth in tissue
culture but failed to grow in eggs and displayed attenuated
phenotypes in mice (Castrucci & Kawaoka, 1993
). These findings
indicate that the NA stalk is not essential for virus replication
but modulates the host range, probably by affecting the enzymatic
activity of NA.
The NA protein of the neurovirulent influenza A/WSN/33 virus strain
differs from all other influenza A virus NAs by virtue of the lack
of a glycosylation site at amino acid position 130. To assess the
contribution of this glycosylation site for neurovirulence, Li
et al. (1993c
) generated a recombinant virus containing
the conserved glycosylation site. The recombinant virus, unlike its
parent, did not replicate in mouse brain, demonstrating that this
NA glycosylation site is critical for neurovirulence. Further
studies demonstrated that influenza A/WSN/33 virus NA binds
plasminogen, which, after being activated to plasmin, cleaves HA
(Goto & Kawaoka, 1998
). In vitro and in vivo
studies revealed that two NA structural features, a
carboxy-terminal lysine residue and the lack of the glycosylation
site at position 130, were critical for plasminogen binding (Goto
& Kawaoka, 1998
; Goto et al., 2001
). Recombinant
viruses in which either one of these features was altered did not
replicate in the brain of infected mice, in contrast to wild-type
influenza A/WSN/33 virus (Goto et al., 2001
).
Ebola virus glycoprotein GP
Expression of the complete, membrane-anchored form of the Ebola
virus glycoprotein is achieved through editing of its mRNA, while
the unedited mRNA is translated to the secreted glycoprotein (sGP).
About 80 % of the GP mRNAs remain unedited, resulting in high
amounts of sGP in patient sera (Volchkov et al., 1995
; Sanchez et
al., 1996
). In contrast, the closely related Marburg
virus translates its GP from an unedited mRNA and does not express
sGP. To address the role of transcriptional editing and sGP
synthesis in Ebola virus replication, Volchkov et al.
(2001
)
generated a virus that expressed GP from an unedited mRNA. The
mutant virus expressed higher levels of GP and was more cytotoxic
than its wild-type counterpart. This finding suggested that
transcriptional editing might control the expression levels of GP
and hence the cytotoxic effects of this protein.
Accessory proteins |
Accessory proteins are not essential for basic levels of virus replication and/or transcription but regulate or modulate a variety of steps in the virus life cycle. For VSV and members of the Paramyxovirinae subfamily, accessory proteins are encoded by the P gene and expressed through RNA editing and/or they are expressed from a second reading frame overlapping the P gene. In contrast, accessory proteins of pneumoviruses are expressed from separate, additional transcription units, involving the use of overlapping reading frames.
Influenza A virus NS1 protein
Among negative-sense RNA viruses, the NS1 protein was the first
protein shown to counteract the cellular interferon (IFN) response
(reviewed by Garcia-Sastre, 2001). In 1998, Garcia-Sastre et
al. (1998
) generated a
NS1 influenza A virus that
was restricted in its replication in MDCK cells and mice (hence, in
systems with a functional IFN response). In contrast,
NS1
influenza A virus replicated to titres comparable to wild-type
virus in IFN-compromised systems, such as Vero cells or
STAT-1/ mice (Garcia-Sastre et
al., 1998
; Talon et al., 2000b
). NS1 interferes
with several cellular pathways to combat the antiviral IFN
response. Double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR)
indirectly stimulates type I IFN, thus playing a critical role in
antiviral responses. NS1 binds to RNA (Yoshida et al.,
1981
),
thereby suppressing PKR (Hatada et al., 1999
; Bergmann et
al., 2000
). In line with these findings,
NS1
influenza A virus, but not wild-type virus, stimulated the
expression of a reporter gene under the control of an
IFN-responsive promoter (Garcia-Sastre et al., 1998
). Moreover,
NS1
influenza A virus activated NF-
B (Wang et al., 2000
), which
transactivates IFN-
-regulated promoters and IFN regulatory factor
3 (Talon et al., 2000a
), which forms a transcription complex with
signal transducer and transcriptional activator-1 (STAT-1) and
STAT-2.
In a study to assess the contribution of NS1 to the extreme
pathogenicity of the 'Spanish Flu' virus, which killed
2040 million people in 1918 and 1919, recombinant viruses
were generated that contained the NS1 or both the NS1 and the NS2
encoding regions of the Spanish Flu virus in an influenza A/WSN/33
virus genetic background (Basler et al., 2001
). The recombinant
viruses did not kill mice, in contrast to the parental influenza
A/WSN/33 virus, and the results were considered inconclusive
because of gene constellation effects.
C proteins
C proteins (reviewed by Nagai, 1999
; Nagai & Kato, 1999
) are expressed by
VSV, morbilli- and respiroviruses from a second reading frame that
overlaps the 5´ region of the P gene in the +1 open reading
frame (ORF). Morbilliviruses and hPIV3 encode one C protein. For
VSV and SeV, ribosomal choice results in the use of different
initiation codons (all in the same reading frame), yielding a
nested set of two C proteins (designated C' and C) for VSV or
a nested set of four proteins (C´, C, Y1 and Y2) for SeV
(Latorre et al., 1998b
). C proteins share a common
carboxy-terminal region but differ in their amino termini.
The relative importance of C proteins for the virus life cycle
differs among rhabdoviruses and paramyxoviruses. VSV defective in C
protein expression is indistinguishable from wild-type virus in
cell culture (Kretzschmar et al., 1996
), while alteration
of the C proteins of hPIV3 (Durbin et al., 1999
) and RPV (Baron
& Barrett, 2000
) restricted virus replication in cell
culture and/or experimental animals. The growth characteristics of
MV
C depended on the cell line tested (Radecke & Billeter,
1996
;
Escoffier et al., 1999
) and MV deficient in C protein expression
was attenuated in mice (Patterson et al., 2000
). For SeV, C´
protein-deficient virus was as virulent as wild-type virus in mice,
while C protein-deficient virus was highly attenuated in these
animals (Latorre et al., 1998a
); this phenotype
was attributed to a single amino acid substitution in the SeV C
protein (Garcin et al., 1997
). Recombinant SeV deficient in the
expression of all four C proteins was severely attenuated and grew
to titres of 4 log units lower than those observed for the
wild-type counterpart (Kurotani et al., 1998
). Most importantly,
SeV employs all four C proteins to diminish the induction of
IFN-stimulated gene expression (Didcock et al., 1999a
; Garcin et
al., 1999
, 2000
; Kato et al., 2001
), as demonstrated
by the experimental requirement to ablate the entire complement of
C proteins to fully suppress IFN-
-stimulated gene expression
(Gotoh et al., 1999
). While all four C proteins interfered
with STAT-1 phosphorylation, only C and C´ proteins induced
its instability (Garcin et al., 2001
).
The various C proteins have both positive and negative effects on
virus replication and seem to execute their function(s) in a highly
coordinated manner (Cadd et al., 1996
; Garcin et
al., 1997
; Tapparel et al., 1997
; Kurotani et
al., 1998
; Latorre et al., 1998a
; Baron &
Barrett, 2000
; Kato et al., 2001
; Reutter et
al., 2001
). Moreover, C proteins may execute
functions in assembly, since a recombinant SeV that did not express
any of its C proteins differed in size and shape from wild-type
virus (Hasan et al., 2000
). Thus, although not absolutely required
for virus amplification, the C proteins affect several steps in the
virus life cycle.
V proteins
With the exception of hPIV1, all morbilli-, rubula- and
respiroviruses contain a V gene (reviewed by
Nagai, 1999
; Nagai & Kato, 1999
). For SeV, NDV and
morbilliviruses, V protein expression relies on the insertion of
one or two nontemplated G residues into the P gene through RNA
editing. In contrast, the rubulavirus V protein is translated from
an unedited mRNA. All V proteins share their amino-terminal region
with the respective P protein but have a unique carboxy terminus.
Suppression of V protein expression has only minor effects on RPV
replication (Baron & Barrett, 2000
), while NDV
V replicated to lower titres
in cell culture and was severely attenuated in chickens' eggs
(Mebatsion et al., 2001
). Recombinant SeV or MV deficient in V
protein expression were not restricted in replication in cell
culture (Delenda et al., 1997
; Schneider et al., 1997a
; Escoffier et
al., 1999
; Patterson et al., 2000
) but were
attenuated in animals (Kato et al., 1997a
, b
; Delenda et
al., 1998
; Tober et al., 1998
; Valsamakis et
al., 1998
; Patterson et al., 2000
). hPIV2
V did not
grow in CV-1 cells but replicated in Vero cells (Kawano et
al., 2001
), suggesting a role of the V protein in
interplay with the cellular immune response.
The carboxy-terminal domain of V protein (which is not shared by
the P protein) contains a cysteine-rich, zinc finger-like domain
that is critical for pathogenicity (Kato et al., 1997b
; Huang et
al., 2000
). It interacts with the large subunit of
the cellular damage-specific DNA-binding protein (UV-DDB), as shown for SV5,
hPIV2, MV and mumps virus (Lin et al., 1998
). This interaction
is likely responsible for the delay in the division cycle of
SV5-infected cells; indeed, the cell cycle progressed normally in
cells infected with recombinant SV5 expressing a truncated V
protein lacking the unique carboxy terminus (Lin & Lamb,
2000
). Most
importantly, V proteins interfere with the IFN response. The SV5 V
protein targets STAT-1 for proteasome-mediated degradation (Didcock
et al., 1999b
; Young et al., 2000
, 2001
). Thus, SV5 and SeV
(through its C proteins) target STAT-1, thereby blocking both type
I and type II IFN signalling. In contrast, the V protein of hPIV2
induces proteolytic degradation of STAT-2, so that type I but not
type II IFN signalling is abolished (Parisien et al.,
2001
).
RSV NS1 and NS2 proteins
The 3´ proximal genes of pneumoviruses (in genome orientation)
encode two short, nonstructural proteins (NS1 and NS2) that are
missing in other paramyxoviruses. The hRSV NS1 protein was
identified as a regulatory protein since it inhibited both
transcription and replication in minireplicon systems (Atreya et
al., 1998
). Deletion of the NS1 gene resulted in
virus that was attenuated in chimpanzees (Teng et al.,
2000
),
confirming the role of NS1 in virus growth. Deletion or insertion
of a stop codon in the RSV NS2 gene resulted in recombinant viruses
that were attenuated in cell culture (Teng & Collins, 1999
) and in chimpanzees
(Whitehead et al., 1999a
). Passage of the NS2 stop mutant in cell
culture yielded revertant viruses whose artificial NS2 stop codon
had been replaced with a sense codon, thus restoring expression of
a (mutant) NS2 protein (Teng & Collins, 1999
). This finding
demonstrated that, although not essential, NS2 confers a growth
advantage to hRSV replication in cell culture. Schlender et
al. (2000
) generated bRSV mutants that do not
express NS1 and/or NS2. These viruses were highly attenuated in
MDBK cells but only moderately affected in IFN-deficient Vero
cells, suggesting that NS1 and NS2 antagonize the IFN-mediated
antiviral response. For bRSV, both the NS1 and NS2 proteins are
required to control the IFN-
/
-mediated cellular response
(Schlender et al., 2000
). Although hRSV continues to replicate in
cells pretreated with type I IFN (Atreya & Kulkarni, 1999
), it does not block
either type I or type II IFN signalling (Young et al.,
2000
). These
findings suggest that hRSV developed an alternative strategy to
counteract the cellular IFN response, one that most likely
interferes with events downstream of IFN signalling.
RSV M2 gene
Expression of the hRSV N, P and L proteins, together with a
plasmid-encoded minigenome, resulted in premature termination of
mRNA synthesis (Collins et al., 1996
). Coexpression of
low levels of the M2 gene yielded full-length mRNAs and
polycistronic read-through transcripts, whereas higher amounts of
the M2 gene inhibited replication and transcription (Collins et
al., 1996
). Similarly, small amounts of the M2 gene
enhanced transcription of a bRSV minigenome (Yunus et al.,
1998
).
Further study of the M2 gene, which contains two overlapping ORFs,
revealed that M2-1 is required to synthesize full-length mRNAs and
read-through transcripts (Collins et al., 1996
; Fearns &
Collins, 1999
) by functioning as an elongation factor
and an antitermination factor (Collins et al., 1996
; Hardy & Wertz,
1998
; Fearns
& Collins, 1999
; Hardy et al., 1999
). In contrast, the
M2-2 protein inhibits RNA replication (Collins et al.,
1996
; Jin
et al., 2000a
) and may play a role in the switch from
transcription to replication (Bermingham & Collins, 1999
). Consequently,
recombinant RSVs that lost the ability to express M2-2 were
restricted in their growth in cell culture and in animal models
(Bermingham & Collins, 1999
; Jin et al., 2000a
; Teng et
al., 2000
).
SH proteins
The hRSV SH protein is a short transmembrane protein of unknown
function. Deletion of SH in a recombinant RSV did not affect RNA
replication but slightly increased virus titres in certain cell
lines (Bukreyev et al., 1997
; Techaarpornkul et al., 2001
) and caused
moderate attenuation in animal models (Bukreyev et al.,
1997
;
Whitehead et al., 1999a
). Deletion of the SV5 SH protein did not
significantly alter the growth characteristics of a recombinant
virus in cell culture (He et al., 1998
). However, SV5
SH
induced greater DNA fragmentation and higher caspase-2 and
caspase-3 activities than did wild-type virus, indicating that the
SH protein interferes with apoptosis (He et al., 2001
).
In one study, expression of the RSV M2-2, NS1, NS2 and SH proteins
was abrogated in various combinations (Jin et al.,
2000b
). Virus
in which all four genes were deleted could not be generated and
deletion of the M2-2 gene together with the NS1 gene also proved
detrimental to virus replication. However, recombinant viruses,
such as RSV
SH,
NS1 and
NS2, were viable, although they were
attenuated in cell culture and in cotton rats. Replication of
recombinant viruses was more affected in HEp-2 than in Vero cells,
suggesting that one or more of the deleted genes encode proteins
that counteract the cellular IFN response. Taken together, these
findings indicate that although the RSV M2-2, NS1, NS2 and SH
proteins are not essential for virus replication, they encode
supporting functions required for efficient virus replication.
Virus vectors |
Negative-sense RNA viruses have several biological features that make them promising candidates as vaccine or targeting vectors. Most importantly, they do not replicate through DNA intermediates, so that integration of their genomes into the host cell genome is a remote possibility. Also, most members of this virus group grow to high titres, accommodate additional genetic material and express the foreign peptides or proteins at high levels. Moreover, strong humoral and cellular immune responses have been observed after immunization with negative-sense RNA virus vectors.
Nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses
Initial experiments using reporter proteins demonstrated that
nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses will accommodate foreign
genetic material and stably maintain it during serial passages in
cell culture (Bukreyev et al., 1996
; Mebatsion et
al., 1996
; Hasan et al., 1997
). However, the
insertion of additional genetic material decreased virus yield in
cell culture (Bukreyev et al., 1996
; Hasan et
al., 1997
; Sakai et al., 1999
; Skiadopoulos et
al., 2000
) and recombinant viruses were attenuated
in animal models (Sakai et al., 1999
; Skiadopoulos et
al., 2000
).
Because of the medical importance of human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1), a number of studies explored the generation of
recombinant viruses expressing retroviral glycoproteins or their
cellular receptors. An initial study demonstrated that the human
CD4 protein, which serves as the cellular receptor for HIV-1, was
expressed from recombinant VSV together with the VSV G protein
(Schnell et al., 1996a
). This approach was taken one step further
with the generation of RV
G pseudotyped by transient expression of
a chimeric CD4 RV G protein and CXCR4, or by a recombinant VSV
G
expressing CD4 and CXCR4 from the viral genome (Mebatsion et
al., 1997
; Schnell et al., 1997
). Both the
pseudotyped RV and the recombinant VSV selectively infected cells
expressing an X4-specific HIV-1 envelope protein, suggesting that
gene delivery vectors that specifically recognize HIV-1-infected
cells might be useful tools in targeting and eliminating these
cells.
To explore the potential of nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses
as vaccine vectors, a number of investigators generated recombinant
RV or VSV expressing the HIV-1 envelope protein and found that they
specifically infected CD4+ cells (Mebatsion &
Conzelmann, 1996
; Johnson et al., 1997
; Boritz et
al., 1999
). After a boost with HIV-1 gp120 protein,
mice inoculated with the recombinant RV developed a strong humoral
response against the HIV-1 protein (Schnell et al.,
2000
). Also,
a recombinant SeV expressing HIV-1 envelope protein was generated
and infected natural HIV-1 host cells, such as human primary blood
mononuclear cells, macrophages and established T cell lines (Yu
et al., 1997
).
The HIV-1 Gag protein is another potential target for cell-mediated
host immune defence, leading several research groups to generate
viruses that expressed this protein. RV expressing HIV-1 Gag
induced a strong cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against this
protein in mice. A recombinant VSV expressing both Env and Gag
demonstrated that VSV can accommodate up to a 40 % increase in its
genome size (Haglund et al., 2000
). More importantly,
this virus protected rhesus monkeys from challenge with a
pathogenic HIV-1 (Rose et al., 2001
), thus
demonstrating the potential of recombinant VSV as a vaccine vector.
Since the viral glycoproteins are critical in eliciting an
antiviral response, viruses were generated with heterologous
surface glycoproteins. Glycoproteins can be exchanged between
members of the Pneumo- and Respirovirus genera, as
demonstrated by bRSV, whose G and F proteins were replaced with the
HN and F proteins of bovine PIV3 (bPIV3) (Stope et al.,
2001
).
Recombinant bRSV was also recovered after replacement of the
attachment glycoprotein only, while replacement of only the fusion
protein abrogated virus generation (Stope et al., 2001
). Substitution of
the MV H and F genes with the VSV G gene in a MV genetic background
generated attenuated virus that protected mice against challenge
with wild-type VSV (Spielhofer et al., 1998
). Furthermore,
recombinant VSV expressing influenza A virus HA or NA proteins
(Kretzschmar et al., 1997
) protected vaccinated mice from lethal
challenge with influenza virus (Roberts et al., 1998
, 1999
). One of the
problems associated with VSV vaccine vectors is the potential for
induction of neutralizing-antibodies against the VSV G protein,
thus preventing reinfection and boosting with the same vector. One
study addressed this problem by generating VSV vaccine vectors that
were based on the Indiana serotype but contained the glycoprotein
genes of the New Jersey or Chandripura subtypes (Rose et
al., 2000
). The G protein shuttle vectors did not
induce cross-neutralizing antibodies and could therefore be useful
tools when boosting of immune responses is desirable.
The immune response to virus infections can be enhanced or
modulated by the coexpression of cytokines. This strategy was
tested by generating MV expressing IL-12 (Singh & Billeter,
1999
) or
recombinant RSV expressing IFN-
(Bukreyev et al., 1999
) or IL-2 (Bukreyev
et al., 2000b
). While for the former virus expression of
IL-12 was demonstrated, the latter two viruses were attenuated,
ostensibly due to the antiviral activity of IFN-
or IL-2,
respectively.
Influenza virus vectors
Influenza A viruses are promising vector candidates (reviewed by
Garcia-Sastre, 2000) because of the availability of 15 HA and 9 NA
subtypes, as well as numerous antigenic variants, which would allow
repeated immunization. Recombinant viruses expressing foreign
polypeptides integrated into the NA stalk or the antigenic sites of
HA have been generated (Li et al., 1992
, 1993a
, b
; Castrucci et
al., 1994
; Muster et al., 1994
, 1995
; Isobe et
al., 1995
; Murata et al., 1996
; Gilleland et
al., 1997
; Walker et al., 1997
). Results
demonstrating immune responses against the foreign peptides include
expression of the V3 loop of HIV-1 gp120 protein (Li et al.,
1993a
),
expression of an epitope from the HIV-1 gp41 ectodomain (Muster
et al., 1994
, 1995
) and expression of a cytotoxic T
lymphocyte-specific epitope of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis
virus nucleoprotein (Castrucci et al., 1994
).
Several approaches have been explored to express full-length
foreign proteins from influenza A virus vectors. Generation of a
bicistronic vRNA with an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES)
allowed the expression of a foreign protein via the cap-mediated
initiation of translation, while the influenza A virus NA was
translated by IRES-mediated internal binding of ribosomes
(Garcia-Sastre et al., 1994a
). Alternatively, the 17 aa self-cleaving
'protease 2A' sequence from foot-and-mouth disease
virus can be inserted between a foreign and a viral protein (Percy
et al., 1994
). The resulting polyprotein is then
cleaved to release the foreign and the viral protein; however,
recent findings indicate that the protease 2A sequence may function
as an IRES instead of a protease (Donnelly et al., 2001
).
In contrast to the generation of bicistronic vRNAs or polyproteins,
full-length foreign proteins can also be expressed from additional
gene segments. Initial experiments with reporter gene constructs
demonstrated that additional gene segments were maintained for only
about three passages in cell culture (Luytjes et al.,
1989
).
However, a promoter mutant significantly increased the expression
of a reporter construct, most likely because of its preferential
replication and/or transcription (Neumann & Hobom, 1995
). On the strength
of this finding, a recombinant influenza A virus was generated that
maintained an additional gene segment with the respective promoter
mutations for at least 11 passages in cell culture (Zhou et
al., 1998
).
Gene delivery particles
The reverse genetics systems established for nonsegmented and
segmented negative-sense RNA viruses can also be used to generate
VLPs for gene delivery purposes. These particles lack one or more
viral genes encoding structural proteins; hence, infectious progeny
viruses cannot be generated. A SeV genome whose F gene was replaced
with that of a reporter gene formed particles only when
supplemented with F protein (Li et al., 2000
). These particles
infected fresh cells, resulting in expression of the reporter gene
construct. For influenza virus, VLPs were generated by expressing
all viral structural proteins and a virus-like RNA that encodes a
reporter protein (Mena et al., 1996
; Gomez-Puertas
et al., 1999
; Neumann et al., 2000b
). The potential of
influenza VLPs as vaccines was demonstrated by Watanabe et
al. (2002
), who generated replication-incompetent
particles from cloned cDNAs that lacked the entire NS gene or the
NS2 encoding region. Vaccination of mice with the latter protected
94 % of mice from challenge with a lethal dose of a homologous
influenza virus.
Live attenuated vaccine viruses |
Many negative-sense RNA viruses have medical or economical
importance (or both), providing a compelling rationale for the
development of vaccines that would effectively combat these
pathogens. Reverse genetics has opened the door for the development
of live attenuated vaccine viruses by introducing attenuating
mutations and/or genome rearrangements (Wertz et al.,
1998
; Ball
et al., 1999
; Flanagan et al., 2000
, 2001
), which should
induce both humoral and cellular immunity, thus increasing the
likelihood of protection from disease. Such vaccines should be more
stable and, thus, safer than conventional live attenuated viruses.
RSV
RSV is the leading cause of viral bronchiolitis and pneumonia in
infants and young children worldwide and a protective vaccine is
greatly needed (reviewed by Collins et al., 1999
). Growth of the
wild-type RSV A2 strain at progressively lower temperatures yielded
a virus (cpRSV), which was, however, neither significantly
cold-adapted nor temperature-sensitive and still caused upper
respiratory disease in seronegative children. In comparison with
its parent, cpRSV contained five amino acid replacements
whose introduction into a wild-type-like RSV background
reconstituted the cpRSV phenotype (Whitehead et al.,
1998b
). This
mutant was subjected to chemical mutagenesis, followed by
biological selection for temperature-sensitivity, in an effort to
increase its attenuation. This approach resulted in the
temperature-sensitive (ts) phenotype cpts248 and
cpts530 RVSs; further chemical mutagenesis yielded
cpts530/1030, cpts530/1009 and cpts248/404
RSVs. Reverse genetics allowed researchers to determine the
relative contributions of individual mutations to the ts,
attenuated (att) and cold-adapted (ca) phenotypes of
RSV (Juhasz et al., 1997
, 1999a
, b
; Whitehead et al., 1998a
). Two of these
viruses (cpts530/1009 and cpts248/404 RSVs) were
tested in infants and children but neither was sufficiently
attenuated (Karron et al., 1997b
; Wright et
al., 2000
). Hence, efforts were made to attenuate
cpts248/404 RSV even further by deleting the SH gene
(Whitehead et al., 1999a
). This modification did not produce the
desired results in chimpanzees; however, a more attenuated
phenotype might only be apparent in humans. Recombinant viruses
that contained combinations of mutations derived from different
lineages were also generated. Introduction of an attenuating
mutation found in RSV cpts530/1030 into the
cpts248/404 RSV background yielded a virus that was more
temperature-sensitive and attenuated than cpts248/404
(Whitehead et al., 1999b
). Alternatively, RSV
NS1 or RSV
M2-2 might
be useful as vaccines, since their replication in the upper
respiratory tract of chimpanzees was restricted 10-fold more than
that of RSV cpts248/404 (Teng et al., 2000
).
bRSV is highly restricted for replication in the respiratory tract
of primates and therefore has potential as a RSV vector backbone.
Substitution of the bRSV G and F genes with their hRSV counterparts
generated a virus that did not confer significant protection
against challenge with hRSV in chimpanzees, indicating that it was
overattenuated (Buchholz et al., 2000
).
RSV exists in two antigenic subgroups, A and B, both of which
should be included in a vaccine. In order to develop a vaccine
candidate, Whitehead et al. (1999c
) introduced the G
and F genes of the B1 strain of RSV subtype B into the RSV subtype
A cpts248/404 backbone. The resultant recombinant virus
proved to be highly attenuated and immunogenic in chimpanzees and
protected animals against challenge with subtype B RSV (Whitehead
et al., 1999c
). Similarly, the subtype B glycoproteins
were introduced into the subtype A wild-type RSV genome and, to
further attenuate the virus, the M2-2 gene was deleted. The
resultant virus was highly attenuated in African green monkeys and
induced protection against subtype B RSV challenge (Cheng et
al., 2001
).
hPIV
hPIV1, -2 and -3 are important causes of viral respiratory disease
in infants and young children. Growth of the parental JS strain at
progressively lower temperatures yielded a live attenuated hPIV3
candidate vaccine. The resultant virus (termed cp45) is
cold-adapted, temperature-sensitive and attenuated for growth in
the respiratory tracts of hamsters, rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees and
humans. hPIV cp45 differs from the parental JS strain by a
total of 20 nt replacements and reverse genetics demonstrated that
multiple mutations contributed to each of the ca, ts
and att phenotypes (Durbin et al., 1997a
; Skiadopoulos et
al., 1998
, 1999a
). To attenuate cp45 hPIV further,
Skiadopoulos et al. (1999b
) introduced an L gene mutation that
specifies the ts and att phenotypes of a live
attenuated RSV into the hPIV3 cp45 background, creating a
virus that was more temperature-sensitive and attenuated than its
parent. In another study, a bivalent vaccine virus was generated
that contained the MV H gene integrated into the background of
wild-type or attenuated hPIV3 (Durbin et al., 2000
). Attenuated hPIV3
expressing the MV H protein not only protected hamsters against
challenge with hPIV3 but also elicited high levels of
MV-neutralizing antibodies.
Vaccines against PIV1 and -2 are not available and there is a lack
of promising live attenuated vaccine candidates. In an attempt to
generate a vaccine candidate, the HN and F glycoproteins of a
wild-type hPIV3 isolate were replaced with those of hPIV1 (Tao
et al., 1998
). Next, ts and att mutations
identified in the L gene of hPIV3 cp45 were introduced (Tao
et al., 1999
). Alternatively, the HN and F glycoprotein
genes of hPIV1 were directly integrated into the genetic backbone
of hPIV3 cp45 (Skiadopoulos et al., 1999c
). A similar
approach was pursued to generate an hPIV2 vaccine candidate;
however, hPIV3/hPIV2 chimeric viruses were viable only when the HN
and F cytoplasmic tails were derived from hPIV3 (Tao et al.,
2000b
).
Chimeric hPIV3/hPIV1 and hPIV3/hPIV2 viruses were attenuated in replication
in hamsters and provided protection against challenge with
homologous wild-type virus (Skiadopoulos et al., 1999c
; Tao et al.,
1999
,
2000a
, b
).
A different approach explored the use of bPIV3/hPIV3 chimeric
viruses as live attenuated vaccines. Introduction of the hPIV3 HN
and F genes into a bPIV3 background created a chimeric virus that
was attenuated and protected hamsters from challenge with hPIV3
(Haller et al., 2000
). Furthermore, a bivalent vaccine virus
was generated that contained the hPIV3 F and HN genes and the RSV G
or F gene in an otherwise bPIV3 background (Schmidt et al.,
2001
). The
resultant virus induced protection against both hPIV3 and RSV.
Introduction of the bPIV3 N gene into an hPIV3 genetic background
identified the N protein as the determinant for host range
restriction of bPIV3 in primates (Bailly et al., 2000
). The addition of
the MV HA gene to this genetic background yielded a bivalent virus
that elicited immune response to both MV and hPIV3 (Skiadopoulos
et al., 2001
).
Influenza viruses
Growth of influenza A and B viruses at progressively lower
temperatures yielded cold-adapted, temperature-sensitive,
attenuated master strains with mutations in some of the genes
encoding internal proteins. Coinfection of cells with a circulating
wild-type virus then allows, through natural reassortment, the
selection of viruses that contain the genes encoding the internal
proteins from the attenuated master virus, while the genes encoding
the surface glycoproteins are derived from the circulating
wild-type virus. Currently, live attenuated influenza A and B
viruses are in clinical trials (Belshe et al., 1998
; Maassab &
Bryant, 1999
; Boyce & Poland, 2000
) but these viruses
contain only a limited number of amino acid replacements (Cox et
al., 1986
, 1988
; Herlocher et al., 1996
), leaving the risk
of reversion to a wild-type sequence. The systems established
recently for the generation of influenza viruses from cloned cDNAs
could therefore be used to design 'master strains' with
multiple attenuating mutations in all viral proteins. Examples
include temperature-sensitive mutations in the polymerase PB2
protein (Subbarao et al., 1995
; Parkin et
al., 1996
, 1997
) or deletion of the NS1 gene, which
resulted in highly attenuated viruses that protected mice against
wild-type infection (Talon et al., 2000b
).
RPV
RPV causes severe disease in cattle, leading to appreciable
economic losses. An effective live attenuated vaccine is available
that provides lifelong protection, but only one RPV serotype
exists, so that vaccinated animals cannot be distinguished from
those that developed immunity due to a natural infection. To
overcome this problem, Walsh et al. (2000a
, b
) generated
recombinant RPV that expressed genetic markers, such as green
fluorescent protein (GFP) or the influenza virus HA. Cattle
immunized with the recombinant viruses expressed anti-GFP or
anti-HA antibodies and developed protective immunity against RPV
(Walsh et al., 2000b
).
Peste-des-petits-ruminant virus (PPRV)
PPRV causes an infection in sheep and goats that clinically
resembles RPV infections. Both viruses are members of the
Morbillivirus genus and their genetic relationship allowed
the generation of a recombinant RPV that expressed the PPRV F and H
proteins (Das et al., 2000
). In contrast, no virus was recovered when
only one glycoprotein was replaced. Further studies demonstrated
that the RPV/PPRV chimeric virus was attenuated in cell culture and
protected goats against infection with wild-type PPRV (Das et
al., 2000
).
NDV
The severe effects of NDV cause major economic losses within the
poultry industry. As with RPV, a live attenuated vaccine is
available to combat NDV but vaccinated animals cannot be
distinguished from those infected by wild-type virus. Thus, a
recombinant virus was generated that expressed the NDV F protein
and a chimeric HN protein whose immunogenic globular head was
replaced with that of avian paramyxovirus type 4 (APMV4) (Peeters
et al., 2001
). Neutralizing antibodies are developed
against the NDV F protein, while the antibodies developed against
the APMV4 HN protein allow a distinction from wild-type NDV
isolates (Peeters et al., 2001
).
Future perspectives |
Less than a decade ago, it was not possible to generate
negative-sense RNA viruses. Now, through a series of major
scientific advances, investigators have the tools to genetically
engineer members of the Rhabdo-, Paramyxo-,
Filo-, Bunya- and Orthomyxoviridae families,
while a minireplicon system is available for a member of the
Arenaviridae (Lee et al., 2000
); no such system
has been reported for Borna virus. The insights afforded by these
advances not only have the potential to increase understanding of
virus life cycles but should also help to clarify the mechanisms by
which these viruses cause disease. As exemplified by studies of
Hatta et al. (2001
), reverse genetics can be used to generate
single-gene reassortants between highly virulent and avirulent H5N1
influenza viruses, e.g. those infecting humans in Hong Kong in
1997. Two single amino acid substitutions in the PB2 and HA
proteins were found to determine the pathogenic potential of these
influenza viruses (Hatta et al., 2001
). The ability to
decipher complex mechanisms of virus pathogenicity will no doubt
increase our preparedness for future outbreaks. Finally, reverse
genetics will allow researchers to design vectors for therapeutic
gene delivery and to produce live attenuated vaccines against the
many diseases caused by negative-sense RNA viruses.
We thank John Gilbert for editing the manuscript and Yuko Kawaoka for illustrations. We also thank the members of our laboratories who contributed to the original work presented in this review. Support for this work came from grants-in-aid from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, CREST (Japan Science and Technology Corporation), and US NIAID Public Health Service research grants.
References |
Atreya, P. L. & Kulkarni, S. (1999). Respiratory syncytial virus strain A2 is resistant to the antiviral effects of type I interferons and human MxA. Virology 261, 227241.
de la Torre, J. C. (2001). Bornaviridae. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, pp. 16691678. Edited by D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Neumann, G. & Kawaoka, Y. (2001). Reverse genetics of influenza virus. Virology 287, 243250.
Whelan, S. P. J. & Wertz, G. W. (1999). Regulation of RNA synthesis by the genomic termini of vesicular stomatitis virus: identification of distinct sequences essential for transcription but not replication. Journal of Virology 73, 297306.
© 2002 SGM
This article is now available in the November 2002 print issue of JGV (vol. 83, 26352662). The complete issue of the journal may be seen in electronic form on JGV Online.